The best CHO expression system kits on the market

The best CHO expression system kits on the market

Thomas Meyer Thomas Meyer 4 min read

Choosing an expression system is a crucial decision for any laboratory, as it can have significant impacts on various projects. The different systems available today offer diverse technologies and varying levels of performance. This article provides an overview of the top CHO expression systems kits currently on the market. Note: This article focuses exclusively on CHO-based systems, as they are the most commonly used for therapeutic antibody production.

XtenCHO™ Race

Contents: XtenCHO™ Race cells, pXten1 expression vector, expression medium, antibody expression positive control vector, XtenFect transfection reagent (stock and working solution), XtenCHO™ Enhancer.

Price: €1,790

Advantages:

  • Delivers, on average, twice the yield of ExpiCHO™, the current market leader.
  • Easily scalable from 96-well plates to several liters in shaking flasks, making it highly versatile for different project stages (from antibody discovery to preclinical phases).
  • Derived from CHO-K1 cells, ensuring smooth technological transitions when scaling up, as CHO-K1 is commonly used for large-scale projects and stable cell line development.
  • Cost-effective, with accessible consumable prices and high yields, leading to one of the lowest cost-per-milligram production rates (around 3.8€/mg, around 3 times cheaper than the current market leader).
  • Batch-based process requiring minimal handling, reducing contamination risks and human intervention.
  • Chemically defined, animal-free medium ensures reproducibility and regulatory compliance.

Disadvantages:

  • A relatively new system with many technological advances, but limited adoption in the scientific community (because it was launched in 2025), making it difficult to predict performance on specific biomolecules.

Conclusion: If you’re looking for an affordable, high-performance, and easy-to-implement system, XtenCHO Race is an excellent choice.

ExpiCHO™

Contents: ExpiCHO™ cells, expression medium, ExpiFectamine transfection kit, OptiPro SFM (serum-free, animal-free medium), antibody-expressing positive control vector.

Price: €3,545

Advantages:

  • Well-established with over 10 years of use and extensively cited in scientific literature.
  • Comprehensive documentation and well-defined protocols, easing integration into any lab.
  • Uses CHO-S derived cells, making it ideal for projects that require scaling up to stable cell line development.
  • Scalable from plate-based cultures to large-scale production.
  • Supports both batch and fed-batch protocols, offering flexibility.
  • Chemically defined, animal-free medium ensures consistency.

Disadvantages:

  • No longer the highest-performing system in terms of yield.
  • Expensive consumables, leading to higher production costs than many competitors.
  • Less efficient for short culture durations compared to newer systems.

Conclusion: ExpiCHO™ remains the gold standard due to its proven track record and extensive documentation. While some competitors offer better performance, ExpiCHO remains a safe and reliable choice for many labs.

OmniCHO™

Contents: OmniCHO™ cells, pOmni vector, OmniCHO™ expression medium & feeds, ACFT transfection reagent.

Price: Not publicly available.

Advantages:

  • Fed-batch system, providing superior yields compared to standard batch systems.
  • CHO-K1 derived cells, ensuring seamless scale-up without technological shifts.
  • Scalable from plate cultures to large-scale production.

Disadvantages:

  • Higher risk of contamination and increased human intervention due to fed-batch processing.
  • Recently introduced, with limited citations in the scientific community.
  • Sparse online documentation, making it harder to adopt.

Conclusion: A promising fed-batch system with strong potential. However, its setup might be more complex for users unfamiliar with fed-batch processes.

FreeStyle™ MAX

Contents: FreeStyle™ CHO-S cells, FreeStyle™ MAX transfection reagent, FreeStyle™ CHO expression medium, OptiPRO SFM (serum-free, animal-free medium), pCMV SPORT (positive control)

Price: €1674

Advantages:

  • Very affordable for a complete expression system.
  • Uses CHO-S derived cells, making it ideal for projects that require scaling up to stable cell line development.
  • Chemically defined, animal-free medium ensures reproducibility.

Disadvantages:

  • Significantly lower yield performance compared to systems like ExpiCHO™ or XtenCHO™ Race.

Conclusion: The perfect solution if you’re looking for a low-cost expression system and are not too concerned about yield.

HYPE-CHO™

Contents: HYPE-CHO™ transfection reagent, BCHO expression booster.

Price: €223

Advantages:

  • Functions primarily as a transfection kit, making it compatible with existing CHO suspension cell lines.
  • Scalable from well plates to shaking flasks.
  • Optimized for CHO-S™ cells, supporting potential scale-up to stable cell lines.

Disadvantages:

  • Like FectoCHO™, not a complete kit, requiring additional optimizations.

Conclusion: Ideal for researchers who want to maintain their existing cell lines. However, as a non-complete kit, it may require more optimization compared to turnkey solutions.

Final takeaways

When selecting an expression system, the market offers two main types of solutions:

  1. Complete kits with optimized protocols – Ideal for those seeking high performance and ease of implementation, though they may require some adaptation.
  2. Reagents to optimize existing protocols – A great choice for labs that already have established workflows and want to improve transfection efficiency without switching systems.

How to choose the right system? Your decision should be based on:

  • Project scale (small-scale research vs. large-scale production)
  • Desired yield and cost-efficiency
  • Existing infrastructure and workflow compatibility
  • Flexibility in adapting to different biomolecules

For a well-documented and industry-standard system, ExpiCHO™ remains a safe bet. If you are looking for an affordable and high-yield alternative, XtenCHO™ Race is a strong contender. If you prefer to fine-tune your existing protocols, FectoCHO™ or HYPE-CHO™ may be the most suitable options.
Ultimately, the best system is the one that aligns with your lab’s specific needs, resources, and long-term goals.